Leadership That Gets Results Essay

The article Leadership That Gets Results by Daniel Goleman provided an elicit view on leaders in the workplace. In a late study by consulting firm Hay/McBer, data was gathered from a random sample of 3,871 executives from a database consisting of 20,000 executives, taking the arcanum out of legal leadership. The study revealed that effective leadership is composed of sextette distinct styles alone draw from components of ruttish in propoundigence.The six style of effective leadership atomic number 18 Coercive, Authoritative, Affiliative, Democratic, Pacesetting, and Coaching. Coercive demands immediate compliance it is a Do what I tell you style. Authoritative mobilizes people towards a vision, a Come with me style. Affiliative creates harmony and builds emotional bonds it a People come first style. Democratic forges consensus through fellowship What does the group think? Pacesetting sets high standards for performance, as in Do as I do, now. Finally, Coaching develops peop le for the future it is Try this style.The study piece an effective leader uses each one of these styles at the right clipping for the right reason. An example of this right time right reason ideology is most often seen in golf. A good golfer knows how and when to submit the right club for the hole. Additionally, the study showed that a combination of styles could be use in effective leadership. However, the study did confirm there are a few styles that are more effective than others. Authoritative ranked the highest among the six leadership styles. Affiliative was ranked second followed by Democratic ranking third. In contrast, Coercive and Pacesetting were ranked the lowest and produced a negative effect when non used in the right context.In summary, the study did take the mystery out of effective leadership. It concluded that there are six leadership styles and each one can be used individually or in a combination to achieve maximum results. Throughout the article I was able to determine my personal style leans towards Affiliative however, I would like explore the vision of the Authoritative and collectiveness of the Democratic leadership styles.