Will the potential spread of democracy lead to a more secure world Essay

impart the potential spread of country lead to a more secure realness (Contra) - Essay fountAccording to this possibility, commonwealth plays an important role in maintaining peace and shelter. The concept further claims that antiauthoritarian nations argon generally peaceful and comparably less war-oriented. Consequently, the larger physical body of democratic nations in the global policy-making system will lead to a smaller possibility of war and greater assurance of security and peace in the world. However, the evidence presented by various experts and researchers, including Siverson (1996), Huth (1997), Rummel (1997), Herman and Chomsky (1988), and the failure of democratization in third world countries, the presence of democratic deficit in transnational democratic organizations like, the European Union (EU), and the growing number of flawed democracies in the world have casted serious doubts on the validity of the democratic peace possible action (DPT) (Ray 27-30 Herm an and Chomsky1-11). On the basis of a scholarly research and available data, the present paper highlights the major flaws of democratic system and attempts to confute the assumptions of the democratic peace theory (DPT). The paper argues that only the potential spread of democracy wont lead to more secure world, rather flawed and unmethodical promotion of democracy can lead to more instability and insecurity in the world.First of all, democratic peace theory has given overemphasis on democracy for maintaining global peace. The democratic peace theory and proponents of democratization have excessively promoted the reduced number of interstate wars in recent years, however, they intentionally ignore the growing number of intrastate wars, civil riots and cultural conflicts in newly democratized or flawed democratic states. The primary estimation of the ethnic security dilemma is the feeling of insecurity that the opposite party may try to take over the state at ones loss.